← Back to Key AI Concepts

Mixture of Experts (MoE)

Mixture of Experts (MoE) is an increasingly popular AI architecture designed to make massive models more efficient to run. Instead of a single, monolithic model where every part is engaged for every query, an MoE model is composed of numerous smaller “expert” networks. When a user sends a prompt, a “router” decides which few experts are best suited for the task and activates only them. This is faster and cheaper, but it creates profound problems for accountability and explainability.

Analogy: The Anonymous Committee

Imagine you are the CEO of a company and you need advice on a critical decision.

  • The Monolithic Model: You have one, single, trusted advisor. You know their background, their biases, and their history. When they give you advice, you know the source.
  • The MoE Model: You have a committee of 16 anonymous, faceless advisors sitting behind a screen. You ask a question, “Should we acquire this new company?” Behind the screen, a secret coordinator points to two of the advisors, who then shout out their answer in unison. You receive the advice, but you have no idea which two of the 16 advisors gave it to you. Was it the finance expert and the legal expert? Or the marketing intern and the guy who is secretly working for your competitor?

This is the accountability problem of an MoE model. The system itself is designed to obscure the source of its own conclusions.

MoE architectures make the already difficult problem of AI accountability nearly impossible.

  1. Who is a “Rogue Expert”? If an MoE model generates defamatory text or dangerous code, the company can now blame an unknowable “rogue expert” within the system. They can claim that the system as a whole is safe, but that one misbehaving component produced the bad output. This is a powerful new way to evade responsibility. In discovery, it’s no longer enough to ask for the model; you have to demand the identity and behavior logs for each individual expert and, crucially, the router that delegates tasks to them.

  2. The Router is the Real Black Box: In an MoE model, the most critical component is the “gating network” or router. This is the part of the system that decides which experts to consult for any given prompt. The router’s decision-making process is just as opaque as any other neural network. Its biases and failure modes determine the entire behavior of the system. If the router is biased to send all medical questions to a “poet” expert instead of a “science” expert, the results will be eloquent but dangerously wrong.

  3. Efficiency at the Cost of Safety: The entire point of MoE is to save on computational cost by not activating the entire model. This means that at any given time, the vast majority of the model’s “knowledge” is dormant. This can lead to a lack of holistic context. The two experts chosen to answer a question might be world-class in their narrow domains, but they lack the broader perspective that might come from the other 14 dormant experts, leading to advice that is technically correct but dangerously lacking in context.

Mixture of Experts is a powerful new technique for building more efficient AI, but it achieves this efficiency by sacrificing transparency. For a litigator, it is another deliberate layer of complexity that makes it harder to answer the most basic question: why did the model do what it did, and who is responsible?